---

The internal dynamics of India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have reached a critical juncture as the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the party’s ideological mentor and organizational backbone, has stalled the central leadership’s plans to anoint the next BJP president. Despite suggestions and discussions centering around key ministers Dharmendra Pradhan and Bhupender Yadav, the RSS has yet to give its crucial endorsement, exposing both fissures and new currents in the relationship between the Sangh and the party.

A Delicate Succession Moment

The BJP is facing a leadership vacuum at the top, with the tenure of its outgoing president, J.P. Nadda, coming to a close. Under normal circumstances, the transition would have been a carefully choreographed affair, overseen by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah. Traditionally, the party chief is chosen after close consultations with the RSS, whose moral authority and grassroots network remain indispensable to the BJP’s electoral machine.

This time, however, the RSS appears to be pressing the pause button, holding back its endorsement of either of the frontrunners—Dharmendra Pradhan, Union Minister for Education, and Bhupender Yadav, Minister for Environment, Forest and Climate Change. Multiple rounds of high-level discussions between the RSS top brass, including Sarsanghchalak Mohan Bhagwat and BJP leaders, have yielded no consensus.

Why the Hesitation?

The RSS’s reluctance, as reported by insiders, stems from its desire for a party organization that is less tightly controlled by the Modi-Shah duo and more responsive to collective guidance from the wider Sangh Parivar. Over the last decade, the BJP’s organizational machinery has become closely centralized, with Modi and Shah exercising near-total authority over major decisions, including candidate selection, policy direction, and crucial appointments.

There is a growing view within the RSS that the party’s next phase of growth requires a return to a more decentralized structure—one where the BJP chief can assert organizational independence and maintain stronger links to the cadre base and the Sangh’s grassroots workers. The names of Pradhan and Yadav, though acceptable to Modi and Shah, do not yet meet the RSS’s expectation for a leader who would act as a true bridge between the party and the wider Hindutva family, rather than an extension of the PMO.

The Age-75 Question and Signals of Change

Complicating matters further are recent remarks from RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, who suggested that leaders should “step aside gracefully after a certain age.” This has reignited speculation about the unwritten “age-75 rule” within the BJP—a norm previously invoked to sideline veteran leaders like L.K. Advani and Murli Manohar Joshi.

Both Bhagwat and Modi approach this age milestone in September, sparking public debate about whether it is time for generational change at the top levels of both the RSS and BJP. The comments have put added pressure on the BJP’s current leadership and fueled speculation about the future shape of the party’s leadership, especially with general elections looming on the horizon.

Political Implications and the Road Ahead

The RSS’s assertiveness comes at a politically sensitive time. The BJP, having suffered setbacks in recent state elections and with the opposition regrouping, is under pressure to rejuvenate its ranks, reconnect with its core supporters, and broaden its appeal. For the RSS, which has always prized its role as an ideological and moral compass, this is a moment to reassert its influence over the party’s internal democracy and future trajectory.

By stalling the endorsement of the Modi-Shah candidates, the Sangh is signaling that the next BJP president must be more than a managerial figure. He—or she—must be able to inspire the cadre, maintain the organization’s Hindutva roots, and act with a degree of independence from the current power structure.

The RSS’s position has sparked reactions across the political spectrum. Opposition leaders have seized on the moment, with Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah openly challenging the BJP to appoint a Dalit as Modi’s successor, citing the opportunity for broader social inclusion. Allies and critics alike have interpreted the developments as evidence of an internal power struggle or, conversely, as a healthy assertion of checks and balances within the Sangh Parivar.

Who Will Blink First?

As the BJP approaches a crucial parliamentary session and key state elections, the leadership standoff has raised questions about how the party will resolve its succession dilemma. Will Modi and Shah find a compromise candidate who satisfies both the Sangh’s demand for autonomy and the central leadership’s preference for loyalty? Or will the RSS hold its ground, insisting on a more radical departure from the current model?

Behind the scenes, the outcome of this tussle could reshape not only the BJP’s future but also the broader trajectory of right-wing politics in India. If the RSS prevails, it may mark a shift towards greater internal democracy and collective leadership within the BJP, challenging the current culture of centralization. If, however, Modi and Shah succeed in pushing through their choice, the centralization of power may continue, but at the risk of alienating the party’s traditional support base.

A Moment of Reckoning

For now, the BJP remains in a state of suspense, with its future course hanging in the balance. The RSS’s intervention is more than a procedural delay; it is a statement of intent—one that seeks to remind the BJP of its roots, its wider responsibilities, and the importance of organizational renewal.

As negotiations continue behind closed doors, the outcome will be watched not just within the Sangh Parivar, but across the Indian political landscape. The resolution of this leadership question may well set the tone for the next chapter of the BJP—and perhaps, of Indian politics itself.

---

About The Author