India’s healthcare system depends heavily on the hard work of young doctors. Yet, many of these very doctors begin their careers under conditions that feel more like punishment than service. Across India, thousands of freshly graduated MBBS doctors are forced into “bond service” — mandatory years working in government or rural hospitals — or else face severe financial penalties. What began as a well-intentioned policy to strengthen public healthcare in underserved areas has now become an extremely contentious, and in many cases deeply unfair, burden on new medical professionals.
This article dives into how this bond system works, why it has become problematic, and why major reforms are urgently needed.
The Idea Behind Bond Service
State governments argue that India does not have enough doctors in rural areas. Government medical colleges heavily subsidise medical education, so in return, the logic goes, doctors must give back 1–2 years of service in government hospitals, especially in remote districts.
In principle, this reasoning does not sound unreasonable.
- Government spends public money to train doctors
- Doctors, in return, serve the public for a fixed time period
But today, the picture is not that simple.
The Policy Has Become Unequal and Illogical
Different states in India apply different bond rules. There is no national standard, no uniformity, and no central guideline. In some states, MBBS students have a one-year bond, in other states two years. Penalty amounts vary wildly—from a few lakh rupees to several crores.
But the biggest flaw is this:
Private medical college students — who pay ₹50 lakh to ₹1 crore for their medical education — are also forced to serve the same government bond.
They did not receive subsidised education. They paid full market cost. Yet they get treated exactly like government-college students who got subsidised fees.
This makes no sense.
Why should someone who paid full fee be forced to “repay” the government?
The argument that bond is a “return to society” falls apart if the person has already funded their own education without government subsidy.
The Working Conditions Make the Situation Worse
For many young doctors posted in rural public hospitals, the experience is extremely difficult:
- Poor infrastructure and equipment
- Shortage of nurses, technicians, medicines
- No senior specialists to guide or supervise
- Delayed or irregular salaries
- Lack of safe accommodation
- Long working hours with zero support
Doctors often arrive into these postings already emotionally exhausted after years of NEET, internship, intense PG entrance pressure — and then they are dropped into a system that is broken before they even begin their career.
Many choose to pay the fine rather than serve — if they can afford it.
Others simply feel trapped.
The net result — rural healthcare doesn’t significantly improve.
Young Doctors Are Not Running Away — They Want Respect, Not Force
The public often thinks young doctors refuse to serve rural India.
The truth is very different.
Doctors are very willing to serve.
But they want:
- fair treatment
- basic infrastructure
- timely salary
- safe working/living conditions
- some career benefit in return
If you treat doctors like criminals or bonded labour, you destroy their morale before their career even starts.
What Should Be Done
To fix this policy, the following reforms are crucial:
1) Exempt private medical college graduates
If you did not receive subsidy, you should not be forced into bond.
Only those who benefited from taxpayer subsidised fees should be required to serve.
2) Offer incentives instead of punishments
Rural service should be something doctors WANT to do — not something they fear.
Incentives could include:
- extra marks / preference in PG admissions
- rural posting allowance
- fast-track promotions
- special housing and facilities
3) One National Standard Policy
The National Medical Commission must create uniform guidelines that every state follows. This will ensure clarity and fairness across India.
4) Improve the system before demanding service
Upgrading rural hospitals — equipment, training, supervision, salaries — must happen first. Only then can rural service actually benefit patients.
Bond Should Be a Bridge, Not a Trap
India needs strong public healthcare. Rural areas do deserve more doctors.
But the current bond system is not a sensible way to achieve it.
Young doctors today already spend 10–12 years studying before they even earn a stable salary. Instead of punishing them with unfair bonds, India should make rural service a respected career pathway, not a forced “penalty year.”
A healthcare system will grow only if its doctors are treated with dignity and logic — not coercion and punishment.
India needs policy that encourages service, not policy that breeds resentment.
About The Author
