Financial Stocks Tumble as Trump’s 10% Credit Card Interest Rate Cap Proposal Sparks Investor Concerns
On January 12, 2026, U.S. financial stocks experienced sharp declines in early trading after President Donald Trump reiterated his call for a temporary cap on credit card interest rates at 10% for one year. The announcement, originally posted on Truth Social late on January 9 (or Friday evening), proposed the measure take effect on January 20, 2026—the one-year anniversary of Trump’s second inauguration.
In his post, Trump stated: “Effective January 20, 2026, I, as President of the United States, am calling for a one year cap on Credit Card Interest Rates of 10%.” He criticized current rates, which average around 20-21% (with some exceeding 30%), describing them as a “rip-off” to the American public that had worsened under the previous administration. Trump later suggested that non-compliant companies would be “in violation of the law,” though he offered no specifics on enforcement mechanisms.
The proposal revived a pledge from Trump’s 2024 campaign and aligns with bipartisan legislative efforts, including bills previously introduced by Senators Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Josh Hawley (R-MO), as well as Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL). These measures have aimed to address record U.S. credit card debt—now exceeding $1.2 trillion—and rising borrowing costs amid economic pressures on consumers.
Market Reaction: Sharp Declines for Card-Heavy Lenders
The immediate impact was felt most acutely by companies heavily reliant on credit card lending and interest income:
- Capital One (COF) and Synchrony Financial (SYF), major credit card issuers, saw shares drop as much as 10-11% in pre-market and early trading.
- Bread Financial (BFH) fell around 10-12%.
- American Express (AXP) declined approximately 4-5%.
- Broader banks experienced milder but noticeable losses: Citigroup (C) down 3-4%, JPMorgan Chase (JPM) around 2%, and Bank of America (BAC) 1-2%.
- Payment networks Visa (V) and Mastercard (MA) slipped about 2% each.
Analysts from firms like Wells Fargo estimated that a one-year 10% cap could reduce large bank pre-tax earnings by 5-18%, with potentially devastating effects—possibly wiping out profits—for specialized card lenders like Capital One and Synchrony. The sell-off erased billions in market value and weighed on financial sector indexes, with some spillover to UK-listed banks.
Industry Pushback and Potential Consequences
Banking trade groups, including the American Bankers Association, Bank Policy Institute, Consumer Bankers Association, and others, issued a joint statement opposing the plan. They argued that capping rates at such a low level would reduce credit availability, particularly for higher-risk borrowers, forcing lenders to tighten standards, close accounts, or reduce limits. This could push consumers toward unregulated, costlier alternatives like payday loans.
Critics also noted that credit card interest income is a key profitability driver for many institutions, especially in an environment of elevated rates.
Skepticism Over Implementation
Wall Street analysts remain doubtful about the proposal’s prospects. Imposing a binding cap would require Congressional legislation, which Trump cannot enact unilaterally. Previous attempts at similar reforms have stalled, and the odds of swift passage are considered low. Many view the market reaction as an overreaction to regulatory uncertainty, with the sell-off potentially viewed as “overdone” once the legislative hurdles become clearer.
Broader Context and Outlook
The announcement taps into ongoing concerns about consumer affordability, as credit card debt has surged and rates remain historically high. Proponents argue a cap could save Americans tens of billions in interest payments annually. However, opponents warn of unintended consequences for credit access.
Investors will closely monitor upcoming bank earnings reports for executive commentary, any legislative developments, and further statements from the administration. For now, the proposal has injected fresh volatility into the financial sector, highlighting tensions between populist affordability goals and industry profitability. While short-term sentiment is negative, the uncertain path forward suggests the sell-off may prove temporary for diversified players.
About The Author
