Apple’s Face ID, introduced with the iPhone X in 2017, has long been marketed as one of the most advanced and secure biometric authentication systems available on consumer devices. Using the TrueDepth camera, it projects over 30,000 invisible infrared dots to create a detailed 3D depth map of your face. This data is converted into a mathematical representation, encrypted, and stored securely in the device’s Secure Enclave processor—never sent to Apple servers or backed up to iCloud. Apple states the chance of a random person unlocking your iPhone with Face ID is less than 1 in 1,000,000, a significant improvement over the 1 in 50,000 odds for Touch ID.
Despite these impressive claims, Face ID isn’t flawless. While it remains highly resistant to most real-world attacks, several practical limitations and scenarios reveal why it’s not as unbreakable as many users assume.
One of the most well-known weaknesses involves identical twins or very close family members. Apple openly acknowledges that the false acceptance rate increases significantly for identical twins, siblings who look very similar, or young children (under 13) whose facial features are still developing. Numerous videos and user reports—from TikTok experiments to Reddit discussions—show twins effortlessly unlocking each other’s iPhones. In these cases, the system’s adaptive learning, which refines recognition over time (including for changes like glasses, facial hair, or makeup), can inadvertently treat near-identical faces as the same person.
Another major concern isn’t a technical flaw in Face ID itself but a legal and privacy vulnerability. In jurisdictions like the United States, biometrics such as Face ID or fingerprints fall outside strong Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination. Law enforcement can compel someone to unlock a device using their face (by holding the phone up to it), whereas they generally cannot force disclosure of a passcode. Security experts and outlets like PCMag have advised in recent years that users concerned about forced unlocking—especially amid increasing civil unrest or legal pressures—should disable Face ID and rely solely on a strong alphanumeric passcode. Features like Lockdown Mode can add extra layers of protection, but they don’t eliminate the core issue.
Technical spoofing attempts have also been explored over the years. Early efforts with 3D-printed masks achieved limited success only under highly controlled conditions, often requiring precise measurements and expensive materials. More recent research into deepfakes, synthetic “master faces,” or attacks targeting depth sensors (like projected perturbations) has demonstrated theoretical vulnerabilities in structured-light systems similar to Face ID. However, analyses from firms like ElcomSoft in 2025 conclude that Apple’s implementation has proven remarkably resilient—no practical, reproducible bypasses have emerged in the wild for standard users on up-to-date devices. Malware-driven attacks, such as capturing selfies to create deepfakes for bypassing facial verification in banking apps, exploit the device’s camera rather than cracking Face ID directly.
Other risks stem from broader trends in biometrics: unlike passwords, your face can’t be changed if compromised in a data breach elsewhere. While Face ID data stays local and encrypted, the rise of AI-driven threats and deepfake surges (reported increases of over 700% in some analyses) highlights why convenience sometimes trades off against absolute security.
In everyday scenarios—protecting against casual thieves, remote hackers, or shoulder-surfing—Face ID excels and outperforms simpler alternatives like 2D face unlock on many Android devices or short PINs. It requires your attention (eyes open and looking at the screen), limits attempts before demanding a passcode, and adapts reliably to real-life variations.
Ultimately, Face ID is secure for most people most of the time, but it’s not invincible. If your threat model includes family resemblance, potential coercion by authorities, or high-stakes privacy needs, combining it with (or replacing it with) a strong passcode provides better defense. Apple continues to harden the system through software updates, but the fundamental nature of biometrics means some risks are inherent—no technology is perfectly secure when your “key” is something as public and unchangeable as your face.
About The Author
