Washington, D.C. — In a pointed critique during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Independent Senator Angus King of Maine declared that the biggest beneficiary of the escalating US-Israel military conflict with Iran is neither Washington nor Jerusalem — but Russian President Vladimir Putin.
“There is a clear winner in this war. The clear winner is Vladimir Putin and Russia,” King stated. He cited fresh estimates showing Russia had gained approximately $6 billion in additional fossil fuel export revenues in just the first two weeks since the conflict began on February 28, 2026.
The surge, King noted, equates to roughly $400–$500 million per day, fueled by spiking global oil prices and shifts in energy markets triggered by US and Israeli airstrikes on Iranian targets — strikes that reportedly killed Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
Data-Backed Revenue Boom
The senator’s remarks were grounded in an analysis released around March 12, 2026, by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), in collaboration with the German NGO Urgewald. According to the data:
- Russia earned an estimated €6 billion (roughly $6–6.9 billion) from fossil fuel exports — primarily oil, with contributions from gas and coal — between late February and mid-March.
- Daily revenues averaged about €510 million (~$588 million), a 14% increase over February’s daily average.
- The vast majority of the extra earnings came from oil sales, as global supply fears — including potential disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz — drove buyers toward Russian crude, often purchased at higher prices by major importers like India and China.
Some reports placed total fossil fuel revenues for the period slightly higher, at around €7.7 billion in the first 15 days of March. The windfall has been described as “excess” or “additional” revenue compared to pre-conflict baselines, helping Moscow offset the impact of earlier Western sanctions.
Analysts noted that this extra cash flow could theoretically fund thousands of Iranian-designed Shahed-type drones daily — weapons Russia has extensively used in its war against Ukraine.
Broader Strategic Concerns
Senator King raised the remarks while questioning military officials about the diversion of US resources to the Middle East. He highlighted risks including:
- Reduced support for Ukraine amid Russia’s ongoing invasion.
- Potential Russian cyberattacks on NATO allies taking advantage of diverted US attention.
- The irony of American military action indirectly bolstering an adversary’s war economy.
Other senators, including some Democrats and Republicans, echoed concerns about Russia as an “unexpected beneficiary” of the Iran conflict. The discussion also touched on the Trump administration’s reported moves to ease certain sanctions on Russian oil to help stabilize global energy prices.
Geopolitical Irony and Market Dynamics
The conflict erupted with joint US-Israeli strikes in late February 2026, leading to sharp oil price volatility. Brent crude briefly surged toward highs not seen since 2022, with daily spikes of several percent reported in early March. While the exact duration and intensity of the price boom remain fluid, the short-term effect on Russia — already adept at using shadow fleets and alternative buyers to circumvent sanctions — has been unmistakable.
Critics of the administration’s Iran policy have seized on the figures to argue that the conflict has produced unintended consequences, channeling billions into Moscow’s coffers at a time when Russia continues its military campaign in Ukraine. Supporters counter that energy market disruptions are a natural byproduct of any major Middle East conflict and that long-term outcomes — including the weakening of Iran’s nuclear and proxy capabilities — must be weighed against short-term economic shifts.
Senator King’s comments underscore a growing bipartisan unease in Congress about the strategic ripple effects of the Iran operation, including its impact on competing global priorities like deterring Russian aggression in Europe.
As the situation in the Middle East evolves, analysts will continue monitoring Russian export data for confirmation of the sustained windfall. For now, the CREA/Urgewald analysis and King’s Senate testimony paint a clear picture: in the opening weeks of the conflict, Vladimir Putin and Russia’s energy sector emerged as significant economic winners.
About The Author
