P. Chidambaram on India’s Road Woes: “The Problem Isn’t Money, It’s Execution”
In a sharp critique of India’s infrastructure management, former Finance Minister and senior Congress leader P. Chidambaram has argued that the real obstacle to fixing India’s crumbling roads isn’t a lack of funds, but the chronic inefficiency and weak execution that plague public works. His remarks, directed particularly at the ongoing civic troubles in Bengaluru, have reignited debate over accountability and the role of private citizens in improving public infrastructure.
A Call for Accountability Beyond Money
Chidambaram’s comments were prompted by an unusual offer from Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw, the Chairperson of Biocon, who had expressed willingness to personally fund the repair of Bengaluru’s damaged roads. The offer, made out of frustration over the city’s deteriorating infrastructure, struck a chord with residents and quickly went viral. However, the idea also drew criticism and defensiveness from sections of the state government.
Reacting to the situation, Chidambaram lauded Mazumdar-Shaw’s sense of civic responsibility but noted that the problem went far deeper than mere funding.
“The issue is not a shortage of money,” he observed. “The issue is poor execution and lack of accountability in the implementation process.”
He pointed out that both the central and state governments allocate significant sums for road construction and maintenance. Yet, year after year, roads remain riddled with potholes, unfinished works, and shoddy materials. The failure, he argued, lies in how these projects are executed and who is held responsible when things go wrong.
A New Model for Public-Private Collaboration
Chidambaram proposed a new model for tackling civic infrastructure challenges — one that combines public funding with private oversight and accountability. Under this system, public money would still be used for the actual work, following the normal process of tenders and contracts. However, a private entity, such as an industrialist, company, or citizen group, would be given supervisory responsibility to ensure that the project is executed efficiently and within standards.
He suggested that these private overseers should be held accountable for quality, timeliness, and transparency, even facing penalties or cost recoveries if the work falls short of agreed benchmarks.
“Let the public sector pay for the project, but let private supervision ensure it is done properly,” Chidambaram said, calling it an experiment worth trying in cities such as Bengaluru and Chennai.
This idea effectively shifts part of the responsibility from government contractors—who often evade long-term accountability after project completion—to a supervisory authority motivated by civic pride and professional credibility.
Bengaluru’s Road Crisis: A Catalyst for Change
The debate stems from the continuing frustration of Bengaluru’s citizens over poor road conditions. Once dubbed the “Silicon Valley of India,” the city has become notorious for its potholes, waterlogging, and crumbling infrastructure. Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw, one of the city’s most prominent industrialists, has been an outspoken critic of the civic neglect. She recently offered to contribute to road repairs personally and has engaged in public exchanges with Karnataka’s Deputy Chief Minister, who also oversees the Bengaluru Development portfolio.
Her offer, while applauded by many citizens, exposed the widening trust deficit between citizens and government bodies like the BBMP (Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike). For residents, the issue is not only about discomfort but also public safety—numerous accidents and even fatalities have been linked to pothole-ridden streets.
Chidambaram’s remarks, therefore, tap into a larger sentiment — that citizens are ready to help, but they expect transparency, accountability, and tangible results in return.
The Deeper Problem: Execution and Oversight
Across India, road projects often suffer from the same chronic weaknesses:
- Inefficient tender processes that prioritize the lowest bid over quality.
- Delayed project timelines, often extended multiple times without penalty.
- Poor quality control, with substandard materials used to cut costs.
- Weak post-completion monitoring, allowing roads to deteriorate soon after inauguration.
Even when sufficient funds are allocated, these systemic failures erode trust and waste taxpayer money. Chidambaram’s comments highlight the need for a shift from funding-based governance to performance-based accountability, where success is measured not by how much is spent, but by how well projects are executed.
Rethinking Public Works: Shared Responsibility
The idea of private citizens or companies supervising public works is not entirely new. Globally, models of public-private partnerships (PPPs) have demonstrated that collaborative governance can deliver better infrastructure outcomes. However, in India, such initiatives often face bureaucratic resistance or political skepticism, as officials fear losing control or credit.
Chidambaram’s proposal challenges this mindset. By assigning clear responsibility to a private supervisory body — while keeping financial control in public hands — his model aims to blend citizen initiative with institutional accountability.
He argued that if implemented in cities like Bengaluru or Chennai, the experiment could demonstrate that civic engagement and government efficiency are not mutually exclusive, but mutually reinforcing.
The Road to Reform
The larger message in Chidambaram’s statement is that India’s infrastructure crisis is a governance crisis. Pouring more money into roads, bridges, and flyovers will not yield results unless there is a transparent, accountable, and professionally managed system for execution.
If governments take his advice seriously, India could see the emergence of hybrid civic models where corporate leaders, urban planners, and citizens collaborate with government agencies to deliver infrastructure that actually works — on time, within budget, and built to last.
Until then, as Bengaluru’s potholes continue to swallow both tyres and patience, the former Finance Minister’s warning serves as a reminder:
“The road to good governance doesn’t start with more money — it starts with better execution.”
About The Author
