Chennai, May 14, 2026 — In his first major political correction just days into his tenure, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay has withdrawn the controversial appointment of his longtime personal astrologer as Officer on Special Duty (Political) in the Chief Minister’s Office.
The appointment of Rickey Radhan Pandit Vettrivel — popularly known as Radhan Pandit or Vettrivel — was issued via a government order on May 12, 2026, shortly after Vijay assumed office and his coalition comfortably won the floor test in the Tamil Nadu Assembly with 144 votes. Pandit, who served as a TVK spokesperson and had been publicly interpreting horoscopes in support of Vijay during the election campaign, was to occupy the key advisory role.
However, the move triggered swift and widespread criticism across political, rationalist, and social circles. Opposition parties, including allies of the DMK such as the VCK and Congress, along with the CPI(M), condemned the decision as an endorsement of superstition in governance. Rationalist organisations and sections of the public argued that it went against the core principles of the Dravidian movement, which has historically championed scientific temper and rationalism in Tamil Nadu politics. Critics also questioned the use of public funds to appoint a personal advisor lacking administrative experience.
Facing the intense backlash, the Tamil Nadu government issued a revocation order on May 13, 2026 — just one day after the original notification — formally cancelling the appointment.
The episode has been viewed as Vijay’s first significant U-turn since taking charge. Supporters described the quick reversal as a sign of responsive and pragmatic leadership, while detractors pointed to the initial decision as tone-deaf and reflective of personal beliefs overriding administrative prudence.
The development has ignited a broader debate in the state about the intersection of personal faith, astrology, and secular governance. Pandit’s close association with Vijay during the campaign had already drawn attention, but elevating him to a formal government position proved deeply divisive.
As the actor-turned-politician navigates the early days of his administration, this swift course correction underscores the sensitivities around blending personal influences with public office in a state proud of its rationalist legacy.
About The Author
