Why Big Teams Are Struggling in the 2026 FIFA World Cup: The Era of Upsets and Expanded Parity
The 2026 FIFA World Cup, hosted across the United States, Canada, and Mexico, has quickly become a tournament defined by surprises. As the group stage unfolds, powerhouse nations that entered as heavy favorites are dropping points in unexpected ways. Spain were held to a goalless draw by debutants Cape Verde. Brazil scraped a 1-1 result against Morocco. The Netherlands drew 2-2 with Japan, while Belgium shared the spoils with Egypt. Uruguay were pegged back by Saudi Arabia, and Portugal needed a late equalizer to avoid defeat against DR Congo.
These results have left fans and analysts questioning what is happening to the traditional giants of world football. Is this a temporary blip, or does it signal a deeper shift in the sport? With the tournament expanded to 48 teams for the first time, the early stages reveal a combination of structural changes, improved competition from underdogs, and execution issues among the elites. While big teams retain superior talent, the format and modern realities of international football are making life significantly harder.
The Impact of the 48-Team Format
A major factor is the expanded format itself. Moving from 32 to 48 teams has created 12 groups of four, with the top two from each group advancing automatically, plus the eight best third-placed teams progressing to a 32-team knockout stage. This structure reduces early jeopardy compared to previous tournaments. A single win, or even a couple of draws, is often enough to stay alive, encouraging more cautious or pragmatic approaches.
In past World Cups, big teams faced high-stakes “group of death” scenarios that demanded maximum effort from the outset. Now, with more matches overall (104 in total) and a longer path to the final, there is less immediate pressure. Favorites can afford to rotate or experiment, but this sometimes leads to complacency or disjointed performances. Underdogs, meanwhile, sense opportunity and play with freedom, knowing that a point or a defensive masterclass can yield historic results.
Critics argue this dilutes overall quality, flooding the tournament with more mid-tier or debutant sides. However, the expanded field has also increased global representation, particularly from Africa, Asia, and North America. This broader participation brings fresher, hungrier teams that are tactically well-drilled and physically robust. The result is a tournament where no game can be taken lightly, even on paper.
Rising Standards Among Underdogs
The “smaller” teams are no longer pushovers. Many players from nations like Cape Verde, Morocco, Japan, and Egypt compete in top European leagues, gaining experience against elite opposition week in and week out. Modern coaching, advanced scouting, and better infrastructure have narrowed the traditional gap.
These sides often deploy compact defensive shapes, high pressing, and rapid counter-attacks designed to exploit any lapse in concentration. Spain’s inability to break down Cape Verde highlighted finishing struggles and a lack of creativity against packed defenses. Similarly, Brazil’s draw with Morocco underscored how organized African teams can neutralize star power through discipline and set-piece threats.
Physicality and tactical discipline play key roles too. In the North American heat and humidity, hydration breaks and travel demands test squad depth. Underdogs appear fresher and more motivated, capitalizing on errors that arise when big teams try to build patiently from the back. Modern forwards across the board are lethal on the break, turning turnovers into goals within seconds.
South American teams have faced particular challenges early on, with several remaining winless in opening rounds. This points to adaptation issues against varied styles and perhaps a temporary dip in the fluid, attacking flair that once defined them. European sides, while generally stronger, are also encountering resistance as opponents refuse to yield space or respect reputations.
Internal Challenges for the Favorites
Big teams are not just victims of circumstance; some struggles stem from within. Aging key players, integration problems in squads blending club stars, and tactical rigidity can hinder performance. Discussions around Portugal’s reliance on Cristiano Ronaldo, for instance, highlight debates over form versus reputation and pressing intensity.
Injuries, pre-tournament form dips, and squad selection controversies add layers of complexity. England, Brazil, and others entered with question marks that early results have amplified. Even dominant possession stats often fail to translate into goals when finishing is off or creativity is stifled.
The expanded schedule also increases player workload. Many stars arrive fatigued from long club seasons, and the need to manage rotations becomes critical. Teams that overcommit early risk burnout, while those who ease in can appear sluggish.
Broader Implications for the Tournament
These early struggles make the 2026 World Cup more unpredictable and compelling for neutral fans. The knockout rounds will likely see stronger teams assert dominance as margins for error shrink and experience counts more. However, the group stage sets a tone of parity that could produce Cinderella runs deeper into the competition.
FIFA’s decision to expand has achieved goals of greater inclusivity and revenue generation, but it has also sparked debate about competitive balance. While some view it as a necessary evolution for a global sport, others worry it waters down the prestige of early matches. The truth likely lies in the middle: more teams create more stories, but the elite still hold the edge when it matters most.
For coaches and players of big nations, the message is clear—respect every opponent and adapt quickly. Underdogs have shown they can compete when preparation meets opportunity. As the tournament progresses, expect adjustments: sharper finishing, better game management, and perhaps more direct play to counter organized resistance.
The 2026 World Cup is still young, and history shows that favorites often recover momentum once knockouts begin. Teams like France, Argentina, and England have shown flashes of their best, suggesting the big guns remain dangerous. Yet the early draws and upsets serve as a reminder that international football rewards adaptability and collective effort over individual pedigree alone.
Fans of powerhouse sides should not panic yet. These results reflect a changing landscape where the gap has narrowed, not vanished. For the sport overall, this openness enhances excitement and global appeal. Whether it leads to a new champion or a familiar name lifting the trophy, one thing is certain: the road to glory in 2026 demands more than reputation—it requires relentless execution against increasingly capable opposition.
In an era of expanded access and evolving tactics, the struggles of big teams highlight football’s beautiful unpredictability. As matches continue, the true test will be how the elites respond when the stakes inevitably rise. The group stage has delivered drama; the knockouts promise even more.
About The Author
