In a significant shift that could reshape India’s aviation landscape, the Adani Group, led by billionaire Gautam Adani, has approached the central government seeking clearance to own and operate an airline. The conglomerate wants the removal or dilution of a long-standing restriction that prevents operators of major airports, particularly those in Mumbai and New Delhi, from holding more than a 10 percent stake in any scheduled airline. If approved, this would open the door for Adani to launch its own carrier and deepen its already substantial presence across the aviation value chain.
The request comes at a time when India’s domestic aviation market is heavily concentrated. IndiGo currently commands a dominant share of around 66 percent of domestic passenger traffic, while the Air India Group holds roughly 24 percent. Together, the two account for nearly 90 percent of domestic capacity. Smaller players such as Akasa Air, SpiceJet, and regional carriers operate on the margins. The collapse of Jet Airways and Go First in recent years, combined with consolidations under the Tata Group, has left the sector with limited competition. Government officials and industry observers see a well-capitalised new entrant as a potential way to inject fresh capacity, investment, and competitive pressure into the market.
Adani already controls eight airports in India, including a majority stake in Mumbai’s Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport, one of the country’s busiest gateways. Its portfolio also includes facilities in Ahmedabad, Lucknow, Mangaluru, Jaipur, Guwahati, Thiruvananthapuram, and others. Beyond airport operations, the group has expanded into pilot training, aircraft maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO), and ground handling services. In early 2026, Adani Defence & Aerospace signed a strategic partnership with Brazil’s Embraer to develop a regional transport aircraft manufacturing and assembly ecosystem in India. This move marked the group’s formal entry into aircraft manufacturing.
According to people familiar with the matter, the Embraer partnership has played a key role in the change of thinking on an airline. The group has reportedly found it difficult to secure firm orders for the regional jets from existing carriers. Owning an airline would provide a ready launch customer and help make the manufacturing venture commercially viable through sizeable internal demand. A senior Adani executive was quoted as saying that while no concrete decision has been taken on starting or acquiring an airline, “there is no doubt that there is synergy for the group to start an airline. The suggestion to the government was to have an enabling provision so that there are no restrictions.”
This represents a notable reversal from earlier statements. In December 2025, Jeet Adani, son of Gautam Adani, had publicly ruled out entering the airline business, citing thin profit margins and stating that the group lacked the specific mindset required for running a carrier. The group’s focus, he said, remained on building and efficiently operating hard infrastructure assets. The Embraer deal and the broader ambition to participate across the aviation lifecycle appear to have altered that calculation.
The restriction Adani wants diluted dates back to the 2006 privatisation agreements for the Delhi and Mumbai airports. Those agreements limited airport operators to a maximum 10 percent stake in airlines to avoid conflicts of interest, particularly around the allocation of valuable take-off and landing slots. The Civil Aviation Ministry is now examining whether the clause can be amended retrospectively. Officials have sought the opinion of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta on the legal aspects. Any change would require approval from the Law Ministry and the Union Cabinet.
Proponents of the policy shift argue that integrated operations could bring stability and efficiency. An airport operator running an airline might invest more confidently in infrastructure knowing it has a committed user. Supporters also point to the need for greater competition after the exit of several carriers and the operational disruptions experienced by major airlines in recent years. India’s aviation market is expected to grow substantially, with the International Air Transport Association forecasting hundreds of millions of additional passengers in the coming decades. The government aims to expand the number of airports significantly by 2047, creating demand for more airline capacity.
Critics, however, raise serious concerns about conflicts of interest. An airport operator that also runs an airline could potentially favour its own flights in the allocation of prime slots, especially during peak hours. Industry executives have warned that such vertical integration might reduce rather than increase competition, particularly given Adani’s already substantial control over key airports. One senior airline official noted that allowing an airport owner to compete with other carriers could enable it to block rivals from accessing the best infrastructure and timings. International experience offers limited encouragement: joint airport-airline ownership has faced regulatory hurdles in both the United States and Europe, where antitrust rules and public ownership norms have constrained such models.
Government officials have indicated that any relaxation would come with safeguards. These could include requirements for an arm’s-length relationship between the airport and airline businesses, prohibitions on sharing commercially sensitive information (such as slot data), and bans on common key managerial personnel across the two arms. Existing slot allocation rules, which allow airlines to retain slots if they utilise at least 80 percent of them, are also cited as a protective mechanism. Interestingly, a rule change could work both ways: airlines such as IndiGo or Air India might then be permitted to acquire stakes in airports, potentially creating reciprocal opportunities and further competitive dynamics.
Adani’s broader aviation ambitions fit a familiar pattern for the conglomerate. Over the past decade it has moved aggressively into ports, energy, cement, data centres, and infrastructure, often seeking vertical integration and long-term asset ownership. In aviation, the combination of airports, MRO, training, ground handling, and now potential aircraft manufacturing and airline operations would give the group influence across almost the entire value chain. Whether this concentration of power serves the public interest or creates new risks remains a central question for policymakers and regulators.
The proposal is still at a preliminary stage. No formal decision has been announced, and existing carriers are expected to mount strong opposition. Competition authorities would likely examine any eventual airline launch closely for potential anti-competitive effects. For passengers, the prospect of a new, well-funded carrier could mean more routes, greater capacity, and potentially better pricing if genuine competition materialises. For the industry, it raises fundamental questions about the balance between infrastructure ownership and airline operations in one of the world’s fastest-growing aviation markets.
As discussions continue within the Ministry of Civil Aviation and move toward possible Cabinet consideration, the outcome will signal how far India is willing to go in restructuring its airline sector. Adani’s bid to fly its own aircraft represents more than a business expansion; it tests the boundaries of vertical integration in a strategically important industry that has long struggled with sustainability, competition, and capacity constraints. The coming months will determine whether the group receives the enabling framework it seeks and, if so, how carefully the rules are designed to prevent new forms of market concentration.
About The Author
