As Volunteer Recruits Dry Up, Russia Digs Deeper Into Its Criminal Underworld for Soldiers
Russia is expanding its reliance on prison inmates to feed its war effort in Ukraine as the flow of voluntary contract soldiers slows significantly. In July 2026, the government submitted legislation to the State Duma that would allow the Ministry of Defense to sign military contracts with convicts convicted under a broader range of serious crimes, including participation in organized criminal groups, banditry, drug smuggling, cash smuggling, illegal handling or theft of nuclear materials, organizing illegal migration, and interference with critical infrastructure. Restrictions would remain for terrorism, sabotage, treason, espionage, and sexual crimes against minors. The move underscores a deepening manpower challenge more than four years into the full-scale invasion.
The practice of recruiting from prisons is not new. It began in summer 2022 when the Wagner Group, then led by Yevgeny Prigozhin, toured penal colonies offering inmates a path to freedom in exchange for six months of combat service. Wagner recruited an estimated 48,000 or more convicts. Many were thrown into the brutal fighting around Bakhmut with minimal training and suffered catastrophic losses. After Wagner’s mutiny and Prigozhin’s death in 2023, the Russian Ministry of Defense formalized and took over the pipeline. Convicts and later those under investigation or in pretrial detention could sign contracts, often with promises of sentence reductions, pardons, or dropped charges, and receive pay that far exceeded typical prison wages.
These recruits have frequently been organized into assault units such as Storm-Z (and later Storm-V formations). The units, typically attached to regular army formations, have been used for high-risk frontal attacks and urban combat. Training is often limited to 10–15 days. Casualty rates have been extraordinarily high, with reports of 40–70 percent losses in some engagements. Survivors and relatives have described inadequate equipment, poor coordination, and a disregard for their lives by commanders. Ukrainian and independent Russian sources have documented thousands of confirmed deaths among convict-soldiers, though exact totals remain incomplete due to incomplete official reporting and the chaotic nature of the fighting.
The scale of the recruitment is visible in Russia’s prison statistics. According to Federal Penitentiary Service (FSIN) Director Arkady Gostev, the inmate population fell from 465,000 at the end of 2021 to 282,000 by May 2026—a drop of nearly 40 percent and the lowest level in decades. Gostev explicitly linked part of the decline to military recruitment drives. Roughly 85,000 of those remaining are in pretrial detention. Some colonies have closed as numbers plummeted, and remaining inmates have been pressed into military production work; Gostev noted that about 16,000 convicts were employed in such manufacturing, generating goods valued at around 5.5 billion rubles annually.
This prison-sourced manpower has become more critical as ordinary voluntary recruitment falters. In the first quarter of 2026, the number of new contract soldiers receiving federal enlistment bonuses fell to roughly 71,000—the lowest for that period in three years—according to analyses of Russian budget data. Daily recruitment rates slowed to around 800–1,000 in early 2026 before partially stabilizing. In Moscow and multiple regions, the spring 2026 influx of new contract soldiers dropped by about one-third compared with the same period in 2025. Russia’s overall 2026 recruitment target has been reported as high as 409,000, yet by early July only about 195,000 contracts had been signed, leaving the effort behind schedule even as battlefield losses continued.
Authorities have responded with a mix of higher financial incentives in some regions, pressure on local governments and enterprises to meet informal quotas, recruitment among debtors, students, and migrants, and expanded use of those still under criminal investigation. In some cases, suspects have been offered contracts in exchange for the suspension or dismissal of charges before trial. Regional bonuses have sometimes reached several million rubles, though fiscal strain has led to reductions in certain areas. The expansion of eligible prison crimes fits this pattern of casting a wider net to avoid a politically costly full-scale mobilization of the broader population.
Critics and human rights monitors describe the system as coercive. Reports from Siberian colonies and other facilities detail beatings, psychological pressure, and threats used to force signatures. Once at the front, many convict-soldiers face the highest-risk missions. Those who survive and return home have been linked in some regions to spikes in violent crime, as individuals with serious criminal records re-enter society after abbreviated or interrupted sentences. Families of the dead have complained about delayed notifications, difficulties retrieving remains, and problems accessing promised benefits.
The strategy reflects a calculated trade-off. By drawing heavily from the criminal justice system, the Kremlin sustains its attrition-focused campaign without immediately expanding the draft to middle-class urban populations that have so far been relatively shielded. It also empties prisons at a time when the FSIN itself faces severe staffing shortages, with vacancy rates exceeding 30 percent in some periods. Yet the approach carries long-term costs. The quality and cohesion of units suffer when large numbers of minimally trained, high-risk individuals are fed into the front lines. The depletion of the prison population may eventually limit this reservoir of manpower. Social reintegration problems and rising crime linked to returning fighters create domestic friction that regional authorities must manage.
As of mid-2026, the new legislative push to include more organized-crime and smuggling offenders suggests the existing pool is no longer sufficient. Russia continues to experiment with other channels—foreign recruits, pressure on conscripts to convert to contracts, and incentives for certain categories of debtors and students—but prisons remain a core, if increasingly strained, source. The war’s demand for manpower shows no sign of easing, and the Kremlin’s preference for avoiding another unpopular general mobilization keeps the focus on these less politically sensitive pools.
The result is a military recruitment system that has steadily normalized the use of the criminal underworld as a resource. What began as a Wagner improvisation has become institutionalized policy. Whether the latest expansion can close the gap between recruitment targets and the relentless consumption of soldiers on the Ukrainian front will shape Russia’s ability to continue its current operational tempo in the months ahead. For now, the prisons remain open for business, and the list of eligible inmates is growing longer.
About The Author
