Pradhan’s Resignation Is Only the First Step — India’s Youth Need a Decentralised Education System
Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan’s resignation has been widely described as a victory for India’s restless youth. After weeks of sustained protests at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar, led largely by student groups including the Cockroach Janta Party, the minister stepped down. The agitation had centred on repeated examination irregularities, most notably the NEET-UG paper leak controversy, along with demands for accountability, compensation for families of students who died by suicide, withdrawal of cases against demonstrators, and systemic reform. For many young people and their parents, the resignation felt like a rare moment of accountability in a system that has long appeared indifferent to their struggles.
Yet the celebrations should be tempered with realism. Changing the minister does not automatically rewrite the rules of a deeply flawed education architecture. The core pressures facing Indian students — extreme competition, chronic shortage of quality seats, an all-consuming coaching culture, and the recurring threat of paper leaks — remain firmly in place. Pradhan’s exit addresses the political demand of the moment. It does little to dismantle the structural conditions that made those protests necessary in the first place.
A System Built for Stress
Consider the numbers that define the daily reality of millions of young Indians. Roughly 22 lakh candidates appeared for NEET this year. Only about five per cent of them secured one of the approximately 1.39 lakh MBBS seats available in the country. Another 25,000 to 35,000 students will travel abroad for medical education, often to countries in the former Soviet sphere, the Philippines or Bangladesh, only to face the same NEET cut-off if they wish to practise in India later. Parallel pressures exist in the Joint Entrance Examination for engineering, the Common University Entrance Test for central universities, UGC-NET, and a host of other competitive examinations that stretch from undergraduate admissions into postgraduate and teaching careers.
From the age of 15 or earlier, the life of a middle-class or lower-middle-class student frequently collapses into an endless sequence of coaching classes, mock tests, rank anxiety and the fear of a single bad day. Extracurricular activities, sports and genuine intellectual curiosity are treated as risky distractions. The result is a generation that is simultaneously over-prepared for narrow examinations and under-prepared for the broader demands of adult life and work. The paper leaks and administrative failures of recent years have only sharpened this stress. When an examination that has consumed years of effort is cancelled or compromised, the psychological and financial cost falls almost entirely on families who can least afford it.
The Problem of Over-Centralisation
Much of this crisis can be traced to the progressive centralisation of high-stakes examinations. The National Testing Agency was created to professionalise the conduct of national tests. In practice, it has concentrated enormous logistical and political risk in a single organisation. Conducting a single paper across the entire country multiplies the opportunities for leaks, technical failures and administrative bottlenecks. What might remain a contained problem at the state level becomes a national scandal when the same examination determines the futures of lakhs of students simultaneously.
NEET itself is the product of a longer centralising impulse. Earlier attempts to create a national medical entrance test faced resistance from states, particularly in southern India, which saw it as an intrusion into their federal domain. The Supreme Court eventually upheld the examination, and successive governments have expanded the logic of “one nation, one exam” into other domains. The current framework places disproportionate power and responsibility in New Delhi while leaving states with limited room to design admission processes suited to their own educational ecosystems and capacities.
This approach sits uneasily with India’s federal character and its extraordinary diversity. Educational standards, linguistic contexts, institutional capacities and labour-market needs vary significantly across regions. A single national examination and a single national testing agency struggle to accommodate that variation. The preference for central control also reflects a deeper political instinct: the belief that stronger government in New Delhi requires tighter grip over every important lever, including the pathways into higher education and the professions.
What Decentralisation Could Look Like
Genuine reform would begin by treating states as capable partners rather than administrative subordinates. Technical and professional admissions could be substantially returned to state-level processes, with national standards serving as a floor rather than a straitjacket. The NTA’s monopoly over multiple high-stakes examinations could be reduced. Expanding the supply of quality institutions — including clearer regulatory frameworks that allow legitimate private and philanthropic players to grow under robust oversight — would ease the zero-sum competition that currently defines the system.
School education itself requires far greater attention. As long as secondary schooling fails to equip large numbers of students with genuine competence and confidence, the pressure on competitive examinations will remain intense. Continuous assessment, multiple pathways into higher education, and stronger linkages between education and employment would reduce the existential weight currently placed on a handful of tests. Legal and regulatory reforms that make it easier to establish and run quality institutions without encouraging pure rent-seeking would also help.
None of these changes is simple. Decentralisation carries its own risks of uneven standards and local capture. Expanding supply without quality controls can produce new problems. Yet the current model has already demonstrated its fragility. Repeated paper leaks, mass cancellations, student suicides and nationwide protests are not minor administrative glitches. They are symptoms of a system that has become too large, too rigid and too unforgiving.
Beyond Political Theatre
The resignation of a minister offers the appearance of accountability. It does not expand the number of medical or engineering seats. It does not reduce the coaching industry’s grip on middle-class aspiration. It does not restore to states the flexibility they once possessed in designing admissions. And it does not address the deeper cultural problem of an education system that too often values rank over understanding and conformity over curiosity.
Indian youth have shown they are capable of organised, sustained pressure. The Jantar Mantar protests demonstrated both their determination and their frustration. Political leaders of various parties have rushed to claim the moment as a victory for democracy or youth power. The more important question is whether the system that produced the crisis will be allowed to continue largely unchanged once the cameras leave and the minister is replaced.
A serious response would treat the resignation as the beginning of a larger conversation rather than its conclusion. That conversation must confront the costs of excessive centralisation, the scarcity of opportunity, and the human price paid by a generation forced to compete for limited seats under conditions of chronic insecurity. Decentralising power, expanding capacity, and reducing the stranglehold of single high-stakes examinations will not solve every problem in Indian education. But they would begin to loosen the constraints that currently define the lives of so many young people.
Pradhan’s departure may calm the immediate protests. The deeper task is to ensure that the next generation does not have to return to the streets for the same reasons. The struggles of Indian youth will not end with one resignation. They will ease only when the system itself is redesigned to treat young people as more than rank-chasers in a permanently overcrowded contest.
About The Author
