Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has put forward one of the most comprehensive and practical roadmaps yet for overhauling India’s examination and higher education system. In a detailed open letter to Infosys co-founder Nandan Nilekani, who was appointed in late July 2026 to head a high-powered government task force on exam reforms, Tharoor described the current framework as “structurally obsolete, morally exhausted, and intellectually deadening.” His intervention comes at a moment of deep crisis. Repeated paper leaks, mass cancellations, technical failures, and administrative chaos in high-stakes exams such as NEET have triggered widespread protests by Gen Z and young aspirants across the country. Faith in the promise of meritocracy has been severely eroded.
Tharoor’s central argument is clear: merely increasing punishments for those who leak papers, as the latest amendment bill seeks to do, addresses only the symptom. The system itself must be redesigned so that such failures become structurally difficult, student anxiety is reduced, and the assessment process measures real ability rather than rote memorisation or the ability to pay for expensive coaching.
The Core Problem: A High-Stakes, Single-Point Failure Model
India’s national testing regime forces millions of students to sit for the same examination on a single day. When three million candidates appear simultaneously, the logistics create multiple points of vulnerability — from question paper setting and printing to distribution, server capacity, and physical security. A single illness, traffic jam, family emergency, or technical glitch can wipe out an entire year of preparation. The system also rewards high-speed pattern recognition and memorisation more than critical thinking or conceptual depth. This has spawned a multi-crore coaching industry that privileges urban and affluent students while leaving talented rural and poorer aspirants at a severe disadvantage.
Tharoor insists that incremental fixes and another committee report will not suffice. What is required is a fundamental reimagining of how India assesses talent, runs universities, and prepares its youth for the twenty-first century economy.
Measure 1: Continuous, Modular, Computer-Adaptive Testing
The most significant structural reform Tharoor proposes is the complete transition away from the single-day model. India should adopt a continuous, modular, and computer-adaptive testing framework modelled on the GRE and SAT. Secure, state-of-the-art testing centres would be established in every district. Students could appear for standardised exams multiple times in a year and submit only their highest score for university admissions.
This change would immediately lower the pressure-cooker environment that currently defines student life. It would also eliminate the single-point-of-failure vulnerability that makes organised paper-leak cartels so profitable. When every candidate no longer has to take the same high-stakes test on the same day, the logistical and security challenges shrink dramatically.
Measure 2: Cryptographic Question Banks to End Paper Leaks
To make traditional paper leaks nearly impossible, Tharoor recommends dynamically generated question banks protected by secure cryptographic technology. No two candidates at the same testing centre would receive the identical sequence of questions. Physical leakage of a “paper” would lose its value because every student faces a unique set of questions drawn from a large, encrypted bank.
Measure 3: Redesign Exams and Broaden Admissions Criteria
Current entrance tests largely test the ability to solve large numbers of complex problems under extreme time pressure. Tharoor argues that exams must be redesigned to evaluate analytical reasoning, problem-solving ability, and deep conceptual understanding. Beyond exam reform, higher education institutions should move to a holistic admissions matrix. Entrance scores would be weighed alongside secondary school performance, creative and analytical writing assessments, and verified extracurricular or community contributions. This would reduce the artificial scarcity created by pure rank-based selection and recognise a wider range of talent.
Measure 4: Genuine Autonomy for Universities
Even a perfect examination system will fail if the universities that receive students remain stagnant. Tharoor points out that most higher education institutions operate under rigid, outdated syllabi imposed by over-centralised regulatory bodies. He calls for genuine financial and administrative autonomy for top-tier state and central universities. This freedom would allow them to design interdisciplinary curricula, introduce contemporary fields such as artificial intelligence, climate science, and advanced biotechnology, and form direct partnerships with industry.
Every undergraduate programme, he argues, should include mandatory internships, laboratory research, or community-based field projects. A degree must signal practical capability, not merely classroom attendance.
Measure 5: Streamlining Public Sector Recruitment
A major source of frustration among graduates is the severe bottleneck in public sector employment. Tens of thousands of qualified candidates compete for a handful of clerical posts through dozens of overlapping and fragmented examinations. Tharoor proposes replacing this maze with a single, unified National Public Service Aptitude Assessment conducted twice a year on the same continuous testing model. Existing vacancies should be filled promptly from earlier cleared lists. Civil service roles themselves should place greater emphasis on technical and functional skills rather than pure elimination through general knowledge tests.
Measure 6: Legal Accountability Through a National Testing Standards Act
Finally, Tharoor stresses the need for institutional accountability. When exams are cancelled or compromised, students are often left in financial and emotional limbo with only vague official statements. He proposes a statutory National Testing Standards Act that would create a clear legal “duty of care” owed by testing agencies to candidates. The law would mandate financial compensation for students affected by administrative failures, enforce strict timelines for grievance redressal, and impose severe criminal liability for institutional negligence or corruption.
An independent Ombudsman for Educational Examinations, completely detached from the Ministry and testing agencies, would audit security protocols, investigate complaints, and publish annual transparency reports. This would restore a measure of public faith that is currently missing.
Why These Reforms Matter Now
India’s demographic dividend is real, but it is also time-sensitive. Young people have demonstrated through peaceful protests that they will no longer accept a system that treats their years of hard work as disposable. They are not asking for lowered standards or unearned privileges. They are asking for fairness, transparency, and a process that respects their dignity.
Tharoor’s proposals address both the immediate crisis of paper leaks and the deeper structural problems of pressure, inequity, outdated pedagogy, and lack of accountability. If implemented with seriousness, they could transform a system that currently decides the future of millions in a few gruelling hours into one that assesses talent more fairly, reduces anxiety, and prepares students for a rapidly changing world.
The choice, as Tharoor put it, is stark: India can continue to patch a collapsing, century-old apparatus, or it can build a resilient, world-class education system worthy of its young people’s potential. The Nilekani task force now has a clear and detailed set of ideas on the table. The real test will be whether the government moves beyond yet another report and acts.
About The Author
