The Beatles Songs John Lennon Tried to Sabotage
The Beatles’ later years were marked by creative brilliance and growing personal friction. By the late 1960s, the once-seamless partnership between John Lennon and Paul McCartney had frayed under the pressures of fame, business disputes, and shifting artistic priorities. While both men produced some of their finest work during this period, the studio atmosphere often turned competitive and occasionally hostile. Among the lingering legends from those sessions is the claim that Lennon deliberately or carelessly undermined certain songs written by McCartney. The evidence is strongest around a handful of tracks, particularly “The Long and Winding Road,” with secondary cases involving “Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da” and “Maxwell’s Silver Hammer.”
The most frequently discussed example is “The Long and Winding Road,” recorded during the fraught Get Back sessions that eventually became the Let It Be album. McCartney wrote the melancholic ballad and played piano and sang lead. Lennon was assigned the bass part, using a Fender Bass VI. What emerged was a performance that many later observers described as clumsy and error-filled. Music critic Ian MacDonald, in his detailed study Revolution in the Head, called Lennon’s playing “atrocious,” noting that he prodded uncertainly around the harmonies and made numerous “comical mistakes.” MacDonald went further, arguing that while the errors were largely accidental, presenting such playing as finished work amounted to sabotage.
Phil Spector, who was brought in to salvage the Let It Be tapes, later claimed that the heavy orchestration and choir he added were necessary partly to cover the deficiencies in the bass line. Paul McCartney was furious when he heard the finished version, which he felt had been altered without his consent. The episode contributed to the already toxic atmosphere surrounding the album’s release and the band’s formal breakup. Whether Lennon’s poor performance was intentional remains open to interpretation. Some view it as deliberate indifference during a period when he was emotionally disengaged and focused on his relationship with Yoko Ono. Others see it simply as the result of a guitarist playing an instrument he was never fully comfortable with, under difficult circumstances. Either way, the track stands as the clearest instance in which Lennon’s contribution actively weakened a McCartney composition.
A different form of resistance appeared during the recording of “Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da” on The White Album. McCartney had written the light, ska-influenced song after returning from India, inspired by a phrase used by a Nigerian friend. Lennon openly despised it, reportedly dismissing the track as more of Paul’s “granny music shit.” The sessions dragged on for an unusually long time, with multiple restarts as McCartney sought the right feel. Engineer Geoff Emerick later recalled that Lennon “openly and vocally detested” the song. At one point Lennon left the studio in frustration. When he returned, heavily under the influence, he sat at the piano and pounded out the now-famous introductory chords at roughly twice the previous tempo and with aggressive volume, declaring that this was how the song should go.
That impulsive, high-energy take became the foundation for the released version. Some accounts treat the outburst as a form of protest or an attempt to force the song to a quicker conclusion. Others, including McCartney in later interviews, framed it more positively as a burst of creative energy that rescued a stalled track. Regardless of intent, Lennon’s hostility was unmistakable, and he later opposed releasing the song as a single in major markets. The episode illustrates how personal dislike could shape the recording process itself, even if the final product did not suffer permanent damage.
“Maxwell’s Silver Hammer,” from Abbey Road, represents another case of strong resistance rather than outright musical sabotage. McCartney had been working on the quirky, darkly comic song for some time and was determined to get it right. Lennon, recovering from a car accident in Scotland, largely sat out the sessions. He later complained that the band spent more money and time on the track than any other on the album, calling it yet more of Paul’s “granny music.” George Harrison and Ringo Starr also grew weary of the repeated takes. Lennon did not actively ruin the recording with poor playing; he simply refused to invest much effort. The song still made the album, but the resentment it generated became part of the larger narrative of late-period Beatles friction.
There is an irony running through these stories. In his final major interview, given to Playboy in 1980, Lennon turned the accusation around. He claimed that McCartney had engaged in “subconscious sabotage” of his songs. Lennon argued that the band would spend hours meticulously polishing McCartney’s material, but when it came to his own stronger compositions—particularly “Across the Universe” and “Strawberry Fields Forever”—an atmosphere of looseness, casualness, and experimental games would creep in. He felt the recordings never fully captured what he had intended. Lennon called the released version of “Across the Universe” a “lousy track of a great song,” blaming a lack of support and out-of-tune performances. Whether this reflected genuine uneven treatment or Lennon’s lingering grievances is difficult to separate decades later.
These episodes must be understood in the broader context of the Beatles’ final years. The death of manager Brian Epstein in 1967 removed a stabilizing force. Business disputes, especially over Apple Corps and the appointment of Allen Klein as manager, deepened divisions. Lennon’s intensifying relationship with Yoko Ono and his increasing heroin use further isolated him from the others. McCartney, meanwhile, tried to keep the band functioning through discipline and productivity, which sometimes came across as controlling. The result was a studio environment in which personal feelings increasingly colored musical decisions.
None of the songs in question were destroyed beyond recognition. “The Long and Winding Road” became a major hit despite its flaws. “Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da” remains a fan favorite and a staple of the White Album. “Maxwell’s Silver Hammer” has its defenders even among those who find it slight. Yet the stories persist because they reveal something real about the group’s decline: the collaborative spirit that had once elevated every track was eroding. What had once been friendly competition and mutual improvement gradually gave way to suspicion, resentment, and occasional indifference.
In the end, claims of deliberate sabotage are difficult to prove. Lennon’s bass playing on “The Long and Winding Road” was objectively weak, and his open contempt for certain McCartney songs is well documented. Whether those moments crossed the line from disengagement into active undermining depends on how one weighs intent against result. What is clear is that by 1969 the Beatles were no longer functioning as a unified creative unit. The friction that produced these stories also helped end one of the most extraordinary partnerships in popular music. The songs survived. The band did not.
About The Author
