AIFF Likely to Freeze Relegation in ISL 2026-27 as League Shrinks to 13 Teams
The All India Football Federation is poised to suspend relegation for the 2026-27 Indian Super League season after the number of participating clubs dropped from a planned 14 to 13. The reduction stems from Diamond Harbour FC’s failure to meet the financial requirements for entry, creating an awkward competitive landscape just as the league transitions into a new club-led operating model.
Diamond Harbour had earned promotion by winning the Indian Football League the previous season. The Kolkata-based side was expected to join the top flight and complete a 14-team competition. However, the club could not clear the second instalment of the ₹1.1 crore participation fee. The first ₹55 lakh had already been adjusted against prize money, but the remaining amount was not paid by the extended deadline of 19 August 2026. A senior AIFF official confirmed the outcome in straightforward terms: Diamond Harbour would be treated as having withdrawn and consequently relegated. The same official pointed to a recent precedent, noting that Churchill Brothers had been relegated the previous year after failing to participate in the second division.
The absence of the newly promoted side has left the league with an uneven number of teams. This development prompted the ISL managing committee to seek formal clarification. FC Goa CEO Ravi Puskur, writing on behalf of the committee, emailed AIFF deputy secretary general M. Satyanarayan asking whether relegation would still apply. The letter requested written confirmation so that clubs could interpret the rules correctly and finalise fixture planning. The AIFF has not yet issued an official reply, but sources indicate the federation is open to freezing relegation for one season, subject to approval by its league committee and executive committee.
This potential pause comes against a significant shift in how the ISL is structured. Since its launch in 2014 as a three-month closed tournament, the league was operated by Football Sports Development Limited, a Reliance subsidiary. It became India’s recognised top tier in the 2019-20 season. Promotion from the lower division was introduced earlier, yet no ISL club faced relegation until the 2025-26 campaign, when Mohammedan Sporting finished bottom and dropped into the Indian Football League. That marked the first time the “closed league” principle was breached at the top level.
The 2026-27 season introduces a further structural change. Clubs will now operate the league collectively through a special purpose vehicle under a four-year club-led model. Each participating club is required to contribute ₹1.1 crore annually. Thirteen clubs completed the payment process, including Churchill Brothers. The Goan side secured entry after Tata Steel transferred its entire stake in Jamshedpur FC’s operating company for a nominal ₹100. The deal included the sporting licence and the contracts of 12 players and two coaches. Jamshedpur had announced its withdrawal from the ISL at the end of July, citing the challenges of the new commercial framework. Churchill Brothers’ inclusion filled that vacancy, but Diamond Harbour’s exclusion still left the total at 13.
With an odd number of teams, a standard double round-robin home-and-away format becomes more complicated. Every club would play 24 league matches instead of the 26 that a 14-team competition would have produced. Scheduling, rest periods, and the overall calendar all require adjustment. The season itself has already been delayed. Originally pencilled in for a 4 September start, it will now begin only after the FIFA international window that runs from 21 September to 6 October. Reports point to a likely kick-off around 10 October, allowing the national team to complete its commitments, including a high-profile friendly against Brazil.
Freezing relegation addresses several practical concerns. An odd number of teams already creates fixture imbalance. Forcing one club to drop into the second division after a season of upheaval—new ownership transfers, late fee deadlines, and a truncated previous campaign—would add further instability at a moment when the league is trying to establish its new commercial identity. Clubs that have paid the full participation fee and committed to the SPV model need certainty before finalising budgets, player contracts, and commercial deals. A one-year suspension would give the ecosystem breathing room while the federation and clubs refine the promotion and relegation framework under the updated constitution.
That constitution itself places promotion and relegation among the “essential aspects” of the top division, partly to satisfy Asian Football Confederation requirements for continental competition eligibility. Any long-term suspension would therefore need careful justification. A temporary freeze for the transitional 2026-27 season appears more feasible and less likely to attract external scrutiny. It also avoids the optics of relegating a club solely because of an uneven fixture list created by another club’s financial shortfall.
Financial pressures remain a recurring theme across Indian football. Smaller clubs and those newly promoted often struggle with the dual demands of competitive spending and regulatory fees. Diamond Harbour’s inability to complete the payment, despite winning the second division, underscores the gap between sporting success and financial readiness. Churchill Brothers’ return via a licence transfer illustrates another path—opportunistic consolidation rather than organic promotion. Mohammedan Sporting’s relegation the previous season showed that the bottom of the table now carries real consequences, yet the timing of that first relegation occurred during a truncated emergency campaign. Critics have already questioned the consistency of applying relegation only when convenient.
For fans and stakeholders, the coming weeks will bring clarity. The AIFF must still ratify any decision through its formal committees. Once that position is communicated in writing, the league can lock in the fixture list, commercial partnerships, and broadcast arrangements under the new club-led structure. The double round-robin format will restore the home-and-away rhythm missing from the previous shortened season, giving clubs a fuller calendar and supporters more regular matches.
In the longer term, Indian football continues to navigate the tension between closed-league commercial stability and the open system demanded by continental standards. The decision to pause relegation this season is a pragmatic response to an immediate logistical problem. Whether it becomes a one-off adjustment or signals ongoing flexibility will depend on how successfully the club-led model takes root and how consistently the federation applies its own rules in future seasons. For now, the priority is ensuring the 2026-27 campaign begins with 13 teams on a clear footing and without the added uncertainty of which club might drop out at the end of an already disrupted year.
About The Author
