Along the rugged borderland where Assam’s Kamrup district meets Meghalaya’s West Khasi Hills, the confluence of three hill rivers—the Dron, the Shree, and the Dilma—forms the lifeline known as the Kulsi. For generations, these waters have shaped everyday life, irrigating agricultural fields, anchoring tribal traditions, and supporting freshwater ecosystems.

Yet today, this shared border is witnessing an extraordinary development. Indigenous communities often divided by jurisdictional lines and historical territorial frictions have put differences aside to mount a unified defense. Communities on both sides of the border have joined forces under common collective platforms, notably the Assam-Meghalaya Joint Protection Committee, to unequivocally oppose the proposed 55-megawatt Kulsi River multipurpose hydroelectric and irrigation project.

The movement highlights how local populations are pushing back against top-down energy and water infrastructure, questioning whether the promise of electricity can justify the permanent loss of ancestral homeland, biodiversity, and community autonomy.

The Infrastructure Blueprint vs. Lived Reality

Conceived as a joint interstate initiative backed by regional development authorities, the Kulsi multipurpose project aims to build a composite concrete dam near Ukiam. The overarching policy narrative highlights multiple long-term gains: steady peak-power electrical supply to regional grids, flood moderation in downstream Kamrup, and controlled irrigation canals for agricultural belts in lower Assam.

However, to the families living in the shadow of the proposed reservoir, the blueprints represent an existential crisis rather than development.

According to community surveys and representations submitted to administrative departments, the project’s impoundment zone threatens to submerge vast tracts of river valley land, placing as many as 46 villages across both states at direct risk of displacement, partial submergence, or economic destabilization. Far from being barren gorge terrain, these riverbanks are composed of fertile alluvial lowlands cultivated for paddy, areca nut, broom grass, tea, and seasonal cash crops.

Submergence here is not merely an economic loss. For indigenous agrarian families, land is non-substitutable capital tied to lineage, customary ownership systems, and burial sites. Villagers argue that cash-based compensation or standard state rehabilitation packages consistently fail to restore sustainable livelihoods or preserve the social fabric of relocated tribal communities.

Breaking the Border Paradox

What makes this resistance particularly historic is the socio-political backdrop of the border itself. The Assam-Meghalaya border has for decades been characterized by volatile territorial disputes, checkpoints, administrative disagreements, and sporadic inter-community clashes. Villages near Ukiam and adjacent administrative sectors like Borduar and Langpih have frequently featured in state-level boundary negotiation talks.

The Kulsi dam proposal has altered that dynamic entirely.

Faced with common disruption, indigenous Khasi and Garo clans from Meghalaya have locked arms with Rabha, Bodo, and Assamese agrarian neighbors downstream. Where political boundaries previously generated friction, shared geography and shared dependence on the river have fostered an unexpected solidarity.

Traditional governance structures in Meghalaya have provided strong institutional resistance. The Syiems (traditional Khasi tribal rulers), Rangbah Shnong (village headmen), and autonomous district councils have declared their refusal to issue mandatory No-Objection Certificates (NOCs) for project survey teams. Concurrently, grassroots farmers’ bodies in Assam have held public rallies and blockades, declaring that the river must remain free-flowing to protect downstream farmlands.

At joint public meetings held at Ukiam, banners written in multiple regional languages stand side by side. Village elders speak candidly: if the water rises, it will drown Khasi and Assamese households without discriminating by jurisdiction.

The Silent Victim: The Gangetic River Dolphin

Beyond human displacement, the campaign against the dam has mobilized conservationists and environmental groups across Northeast India due to the presence of one of the world’s most endangered aquatic mammals: the South Asian river dolphin, locally called the Xihu (Platanista gangetica).

The Kulsi River represents one of the few viable, critical refuge habitats for the Gangetic river dolphin outside the turbulent mainstream of the Brahmaputra. The river’s unique hydrological balance—its mix of deep pools, sandbars, and seasonal sediment flows—has provided a protected breeding and feeding ground for an estimated isolated pod of dolphins.

Freshwater biologists have sounded urgent alarms regarding dam construction:

• Hydrological Disruption: A large dam alters the natural flow regime, replacing fluctuating seasonal pulses with regulated discharges that scour riverbeds and destroy fish nurseries.
• Habitat Fragmentation: Dams physically cut off migratory aquatic species. Dolphins require deep, continuous pools connected by flowing channels; trapping or dividing small populations rapidly leads to inbreeding and localized extinction.
• Sediment Trapping: Reservoirs retain essential silt and river sand, which alters downstream morphology and depletes the micro-habitats that fish and aquatic fauna require.

For downstream fishermen who have coexisted with the Xihu for decades, preserving the dolphin is intrinsically linked to safeguarding the river’s fishery yield, which sustains thousands of daily livelihoods.

Customary Autonomy and Constitutional Friction

The clash over the Kulsi dam also illustrates broader governance tensions in India’s Northeast, where sixth-schedule tribal autonomy mechanisms intersect with central and state infrastructure planning.

In Meghalaya, land ownership is predominantly governed by customary community rights and autonomous district councils rather than state eminent domain. Without authentic community consent and clearances from village durbars, any attempt by state agencies to proceed with environmental impact assessments, land surveys, or core construction meets immediate legal and administrative challenges.

Villagers assert that public consultation processes for large hydro projects are often treated as formalities, with environmental and social impact assessments drafted without meaningful on-the-ground participation of those facing displacement. The current agitation insists that prior informed consent cannot be bypassed by high-level interstate agreements made in distant administrative capitals.

A Crossroad for Regional Energy Policy

The united stand against the Kulsi dam reflects an evolving perspective among riverine communities across Northeast India. The region, frequently branded as the potential “powerhouse” of India due to its torrential monsoon rivers and steep terrain, is seeing an increasing frequency of popular resistance against mega-dams, whether in the Siang Valley of Arunachal Pradesh, the Subansiri River borders, or the hill streams of Meghalaya.

The villagers along the Kulsi are not asking for increased compensation packages or minor adjustments to reservoir elevations; their demand is the outright cancellation of the dam in favor of decentralized, non-destructive alternatives:

1. Prioritizing watershed restoration and minor, run-of-the-river micro-hydro systems that avoid large reservoirs.
2. Developing local earthen bunds and community-managed embankment reinforcement to counter seasonal floods without building massive barriers.
3. Formally declaring the Kulsi basin a community-conserved aquatic sanctuary, preserving both indigenous farming rights and dolphin ecosystems.

By coming together across state borders, the villagers around Ukiam have sent a clear message to decision-makers: ecological stability and communal land rights are not secondary details in energy transition planning. As long as the plans for the dam remain on the table, the communities along the Kulsi intend to keep standing shoulder to shoulder.

About The Author