In the crowded landscape of modern investigative media, few releases have triggered as sharp and immediate an institutional earthquake as The Friendship Files: How Modi and Adani Stole India. Produced by Hotmail co-founder turned public commentator Sabeer Bhatia alongside the digital platform Shadow Citizens, the 36-minute video documentary arrived with the intent of dissecting an alliance that has come to define contemporary Indian political economy: the decades-long relationship between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and industrialist Gautam Adani.
Almost immediately upon its release, the film was met with a fierce legal response. Adani Enterprises initiated a ₹50-crore civil defamation suit against Bhatia and his collaborators, swiftly securing court injunctions to block the streaming, reposting, and dissemination of the video across digital platforms. Yet, while the legal maneuvers succeeded in scrubbing the video from primary channels, they inadvertently renewed intense scrutiny over the central question the film sought to answer: where does state-driven infrastructure development end, and state-backed crony capitalism begin?
The Gujarat Crucible: Roots of a Strategic Alignment
To understand the thesis at the heart of The Friendship Files, one must look back not to New Delhi, but to the western coastal state of Gujarat in the early 2000s. Narendra Modi assumed office as Gujarat’s Chief Minister in late 2001, a tenure quickly shadowed by the catastrophic communal riots of 2002. In the political and diplomatic aftermath, several prominent industry leaders within premier business associations expressed unease over Gujarat’s law and order climate and governance.
It was during this period of estrangement from parts of the traditional corporate establishment that Gautam Adani broke rank. Rather than keeping Gujarat at arm’s length, Adani openly backed Modi, helping spearhead the creation of the Vibrant Gujarat Global Summit in 2003. The summit transformed into a high-octane branding platform designed to project Gujarat as an investor-friendly, business-first administrative powerhouse.
In parallel, Adani’s enterprise grew at a breathtaking pace. Mundra Port, situated along the Gulf of Kutch, received extensive land parcels and regulatory approvals to evolve from a modest terminal into India’s largest private commercial port and Special Economic Zone (SEZ). The documentary traces this period as the foundational contract between the two men: an ambitious political leader determined to showcase visible industrial execution, and an audacious businessman willing to commit substantial private capital to execute high-risk, mega-scale infrastructure.
The National Pivot: Airports, Energy, and Concessions
When Narendra Modi swept to national power as Prime Minister in 2014, the scale of Adani’s domestic opportunities shifted from a single coastline to the entire subcontinent. Critics, including the creators of The Friendship Files, argue that this transition marked a fundamental shift from competitive public contracting to systemic economic consolidation.
A centerpiece of the documentary’s narrative is the 2019 privatization of six major Indian airports—Ahmedabad, Lucknow, Mangaluru, Jaipur, Guwahati, and Thiruvananthapuram. Prior to the tender, the central government waived the long-standing requirement that bidders possess prior experience in operating and managing airports. Despite internal objections raised by the Department of Economic Affairs and NITI Aayog regarding the risks of market concentration, the modified bidding rules enabled the Adani Group to win the concessions for all six airports in a clean sweep, overnight creating the country’s single largest private airport operator.
Beyond aviation, the documentary highlights similar expansions across critical utilities:
- Ports and Logistics: Securing long-term leases on strategic maritime terminals along India’s eastern and western seaboards.
- Power and Coal: Expanding thermal power stations, managing vast domestic coal supply chains, and becoming the preeminent private coal importer.
- Urban Redevelopment: Winning the multi-billion-dollar concession to redevelop Dharavi in Mumbai, one of Asia’s largest informal settlements, amid ongoing disputes over eligibility criteria and land allotment.
To detractors, these wins reflect tailored regulatory frameworks designed to facilitate a single corporate entity’s ascendancy. To defenders, they represent an Indian conglomerate capable of out-bidding rivals and deploying the immense balance-sheet leverage required to complete long-gestation, highly complex national assets.
Global Ambitions and Diplomatic Synergy
The Friendship Files also focuses its lens beyond India’s borders, arguing that Adani’s international footprint has closely mirrored India’s foreign policy priorities and bilateral diplomacy.
The documentary examines landmark global projects: the Carmichael coal mine in Queensland, Australia; the strategic Colombo West International Terminal in Sri Lanka; the Haifa port acquisition in Israel; and long-term cross-border power agreements supplying electricity to Bangladesh. In each instance, the film alleges that high-level state visits, bilateral credit lines from Indian public-sector banks, and diplomatic interventions smoothed the path for the Adani Group’s cross-border ventures.
The government and corporate stance contends that supporting domestic companies in overseas strategic ventures is standard practice for any major geopolitical power—pointing to how Western, Chinese, and East Asian nations routinely deploy statecraft to help their flagship corporations secure critical trade choke points, minerals, and supply lines.
The Collision of Free Speech and Corporate Reputation
The swift judicial orders targeting The Friendship Files have ignited a sharp debate surrounding free expression and corporate liability. Adani Enterprises’ legal filings argued that the documentary was a coordinated effort to inflict irreparable reputational damage. The company emphasized that the film relied on selective omissions, unsubstantiated allegations of official misconduct, and recycled narratives that had already been addressed by Indian regulatory institutions and reviewed by Supreme Court-appointed committees in the wake of the 2023 Hindenburg Research report.
Conversely, civil liberties advocates and opposition leaders have pointed to the speed of the court-mandated takedown notices served to content hosts and social media users as indicative of a shrinking space for corporate scrutiny. They maintain that deep analytical examinations of private monopolies operating state-concessioned infrastructure are matters of urgent public interest, not merely private commercial grievances.
Two Visions of the Political Economy
Ultimately, The Friendship Files serves as a focal point for two fundamentally irreconcilable visions of India’s economic growth:
- The Critical Paradigm: In this view, the Modi–Adani dynamic epitomizes an oligarchic structure wherein economic power and political power reinforce one another. Concentration of essential transit, electricity, and supply networks within a single corporate family is seen as an existential systemic risk, stifling fair competition and creating a “too-big-to-fail” dependency that exposes the broader economy to sovereign-level shocks.
- The Nation-Building Paradigm: The counter-view holds that India cannot bridge its historic infrastructure deficit through fragmented, small-scale private enterprise. Proponents argue that only industrial champions with massive domestic execution capability can deliver the scale, velocity, and capital required to compete with global heavyweights. In this framework, public tenders are conducted via transparent open processes, and the conglomerate’s success stems from superior engineering competence rather than state patronage.
Whether framed as a case study in visionary nation-building or a cautionary tale of unchecked corporate concentration, the debate unsealed by The Friendship Files remains far from resolved. As legal battles play out in courtroom corridors, the underlying conversation over who builds, owns, and controls India’s vital infrastructure continues to define the trajectory of the modern nation.
About The Author
