****
**New Delhi, April 29, 2026** — The long-awaited final Naga Peace Accord remains stalled more than a decade after the signing of the historic Framework Agreement, with the NSCN-IM accusing the Indian government of lacking the will to conclude a deal.
In an exclusive interview published by EastMojo in late October 2025, VS Atem, Deputy Ato Kilonser (Deputy Prime Minister) of the National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Isak-Muivah (NSCN-IM), stated bluntly that “Delhi doesn’t want to clinch the deal.” He claimed the Centre has been diluting the spirit of the 2015 Framework Agreement and is introducing new complications that hinder progress.
### The 2015 Framework Agreement and Its Unfulfilled Promise
The Framework Agreement was signed on August 3, 2015, between the Government of India and the NSCN-IM in the presence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. It was widely welcomed as a breakthrough in one of India’s oldest insurgencies, which dates back to the 1950s. The agreement recognised the “unique history, culture, and position” of the Naga people and came after an indefinite ceasefire in 1997.
However, despite multiple rounds of talks over the years, a comprehensive final peace accord has not materialised. Core differences persist between the two sides.
### Key Points of Contention
The NSCN-IM continues to demand recognition of a **separate Naga flag** and **constitution**, often described by the group as elements of “shared sovereignty.” The outfit also seeks broader territorial integration under the concept of “Nagalim,” which envisions uniting all Naga-inhabited areas across Indian states and parts of Myanmar.
The Government of India, on the other hand, has maintained that any solution must remain within the framework of the Indian Constitution. Demands for a separate flag and constitution have been firmly rejected. Officials argue that parallel negotiations with other Naga groups, such as the NNPGs (Naga National Political Groups), reflect an inclusive approach rather than a delay tactic.
NSCN-IM leaders have also raised concerns over recent government measures, including border fencing with Myanmar and potential changes to the Free Movement Regime (FMR), which they believe could divide Naga communities living across the international border.
### Current Status of Talks
As of late April 2026, the peace process remains deadlocked. NSCN-IM has occasionally warned of resuming armed struggle or seeking alternative interventions if their core aspirations are not addressed honourably. NSCN-IM chief Thuingaleng Muivah’s return after years away had briefly sparked speculation of a breakthrough, but no concrete progress has been reported.
The Centre has pursued a multi-track strategy, reaching separate understandings with various Naga factions, including arrangements for greater administrative autonomy for Eastern Nagaland groups. While these moves have been welcomed by some sections, the NSCN-IM views them with suspicion, accusing the government of a “divide and rule” policy.
Efforts at reconciliation among Naga factions through platforms like the Forum for Naga Reconciliation continue, yet deep divisions remain. Neighbouring states such as Manipur, Assam, and Arunachal Pradesh have also expressed reservations about any territorial adjustments that could affect their boundaries.
### A Complex Challenge
The Naga issue continues to be one of the most intricate internal security and political challenges facing India. It requires balancing legitimate aspirations for cultural and political recognition with the imperatives of national unity and constitutional integrity.
Both sides have traded accusations of delaying tactics, and trust deficits continue to hamper forward movement. For a lasting resolution, analysts say sustained dialogue, mutual compromise, and broader consultation with all stakeholders will be essential.
The full interview with VS Atem remains available on EastMojo’s platform for those seeking deeper insights into the NSCN-IM’s current stance. Developments in the Naga peace process are closely watched across Northeast India, with hopes for an honourable and inclusive settlement still alive despite the prolonged impasse.
